The Ultimate Guide to Story Stakes

Master story stakes and you will be able to transform readers into raving fans and keep them turning the pages of your screenplay or novel. With this ebook, you will learn about:

  • 11 story stakes which increase tension and reader engagement
  • 8 modulating factors you can use to elicit extra emotion from your readers
  • using stakes to craft a premise with more commercial appeal
  • specific strategies to raise the stakes--even when they're already high to begin with!

* This ebook can be borrowed through Kindle Unlimited (US, UK, & DE only), which is free for the first 30 days. Please note: at this time, this writing guide is exclusively available on Amazon.

Exposition in Film: Definition + Examples from The Tourist

Exposition in Film: Definition & Examples from the Tourist

What is exposition exactly? It’s just information. Usually details that your audience needs to understand a later plot development or an anecdote to explain your hero’s personality flaws.

Without the exposition, your reader would be confused about key moments in your script. So it’s an essential ingredient that you really need to master in order to write screenplays that sell.

The yellow writing at the beginning of the first Stars Wars movie is perhaps the most famous example of screenplay exposition. George Lucas got away with quite literally spelling out all the details of his fictional world in 1977, but you won’t be able to get away with that anymore. Your exposition will have to come out in dialogue, and unfortunately it isn’t easy. Done wrong, your expository dialogue will be clunky and boring…causing even the most forgiving reader to disengage from your script.

Fortunately, bad exposition is easy to identify. With a little bit of practice, you’ll be able to turn clunky exposition into dulcet dialogue. This post is to help you get started in the right direction by providing examples of exposition from the slow-burning thriller, The Tourist, starring Angelina Jolie and Johnny Depp.

The screenplay draft I found was written by Julian Fellows (creator of the masterful Downton Abbey and Gosford Park), with revisions by William Wheeler. While well-written, the movie significantly improved upon the screenplay template, especially with respect to exposition. So in each of the examples below, you’ll see how the screenplay approached expository information and then how the movie handled it. Examining the differences should help you develop your own strategy for writing exposition.

To really learn from this post, I highly recommend you watch the movie first. Also, I’m including dialogue from the screenplay as much as possible, which makes this article rather long. You might want to print it first and read it later.

Exposition Example #1: The skinny on Alexander Pearce

Key Expository Information: Alexander owes the US government almost $750 million dollars in taxes.

Exposition example: Acheson & Alexander's backstory

The acerbic Acheson, consummate British detective

Exposition in the screenplay: the information was presented through a security briefing at Interpol. Ackerman, the head of the investigation, gives a Power Point presentation which reveals details about Alexander’s childhood, his money laundering schemes, his theft from Russian crime lord Ivan Demidov…and the grotesque amount of taxes he owes to the government.


Behind the ornate, 17th century doors is a high-tech
amphitheater style briefing room. All glass and steel.

Suited bureaucrats and officers from all over Europe
listen to Ackerman as he leads the meeting from the

Our target’s name is Alexander
Pearce. British citizen, born in
London into an ordinary middle
class family. The only thing
remarkable about his childhood was
a preternatural gift for numbers.

Ackerman clicks a slide projected on a large screen
behind him: a fuzzy photo of a British schoolboy with a
shy grin.

Which he used to hack into a
computer and fix the test results
his final year at school.

JEAN LUC (French Interpol liaison) looks up skeptically.

Your mastermind couldn’t pass his
exams on his own?

He didn’t fix his test scores; he
fixed the scores for all the girls
in the class. It made him very

A ripple of laughter through the group.

What started as school pranks
eventually became something much
more serious. After a year in the
training program at Goldman Sachs,
he decided that gambling suited
him better than working for a
living. That, in turn, involved
him with some rather unsavory
people and ultimately led him to
put his financial genius to work
in his true calling: money

QUINN is the Swiss Interpol liaison. He speaks with the
crisp accent of a man who is fluent in several languages.

You’ve assembled quite a task
force to catch a common money
launderer, Mr. Ackerman.

There is nothing common about
Alexander Pearce. Quiet simply,
he has turned money laundering
into an art form. His greatest
innovation: The False Lawsuit.

He clicks through a series of flashy Powerpoint slides
illustrating Pearce’s financial dealings.

Pearce sets up two companies: one
is a Casino in Arizona for example
and the other is a shell company
in the Cayman Islands.
The Cayman Islands company files a
lawsuit against the casino,
claiming copyright infringement or
some other complaint. They
“succeed” in winning the case and
the casino pays the shell company
an enormous settlement.

The money travels from America to
the Cayman Islands…

Yes, but now the money is legal.

Not quite legal. The I.R.S. has
been cheated out of the revenue.
We calculate that Mr. Pearce’s tax
bill currently stands at $743.7
million dollars.

Jean Luc leans toward his colleague.

(whispers in French)
That explains what the American
harridan is doing here.

Ms. Jones gives him a glacial stare.

Exactement, monsieur.

Jean Luc reddens. Oops. Apparently not every American
fits the stereotype.

Mr. Pearce has some other debts as
well. Most of you will recognize
Ivan Demidov…

Click: A PHOTO of a balding RUSSIAN OLIGARCH emerging
from a limo.

…Pearce laundered over a billion
dollars for Demidov. At some
point Pearce decided he’d rather
steal from Demidov than help him
Given Demidov’s ties to organized
crime, I’d say that was a mistake.

(clears her throat)
The U.S. Government is not
participating in an investigation
of a member of the Russian
parliament; our target is
Alexander Pearce.

Ackerman smiles coolly at her.

Of course.

An INTERPOL OFFICER from Germany raises his hand.

Has Mr. Pearce ever been in

Ackerman looks down for a moment, as if it pains him to


Exposition in the movie: Before I get to that, let me just mention that they made Alexander British in the movie, and he owes the British government an obscene amount of pounds. Second, Ackerman’s name is changed to Acheson…and he’s no longer the head of the unit investigating Alexander. That honor belongs to Chief Inspector Jones, played very handsomely by Timothy Dalton.

In the movie, Jones scolds Acheson for his inept handling of the investigation: “Alexander Pearce owes the government 744 million in illegal assets…which we might seize…this operation so far has cost me eight. If I thought there were more than a 1/100 chance you could be successful, it would be rational for me to continue this operation. But, I do not.”

This way of dispersing information about Alexander’s tax bill is better than the way it was done in the screenplay because you’re not just getting dry information (albeit intermixed with light doses of humor), you’re also learning about the supporting characters and their dynamic.

Because of his caustic dressing down of Acheson, Jones becomes a memorable figure of authority, which pays off later in the climax. Acheson also becomes the underdog, and you feel a little sorry for the guy who has a lot riding on this particular investigation. When the audience is focused on character dynamics instead of information, it’s usually a sign you’ve successfully presented the exposition in your screenplay!

Exposition Example #2: the sofa

Key Expository Information: okay, so this is pretty minor really…Elise and Frank share a suite at the luxurious Hotel Danieli, but they’ll be sleeping separately

Exposition example: the sofa in The Tourist

There’ll be no Angelina on that sofa tonight

Exposition in the screenplay: This was handled with a few lines.


Frank stands on the balcony in a daze. He stares down at
the Molo and across St. Mark’s Basin to San Georgio
Maggiore. Cara joins him.

You like it?

Frank opens his mouth to answer. Then laughs.

What’s not to like?

I’d have been bored here on my
own. There’s more than enough
room for two.

I can see that.

I didn’t ask for an extra bed…

Frank looks at her for a beat, barely able to breathe.

Are you all right with the sofa?
If you like, I can have them bring
one up?

His face falls. He tries to cover up his reaction.

No, no, no. The sofa’s fine.
Perfect in fact.

Before he can say more, the buzzer sounds.

This pretty succinctly addresses the issue of sleeping arrangements, but it could’ve been done even more succinctly…

Exposition in the movie: In the movie, this information was conveyed with barely a spoken word. After a lovely dinner together and a rather steamy kiss, Elise goes into the bedroom with these parting words, “I do hope the couch will be comfortable.” Frank follows her–and is greeted by a solid wooden door closing in his face.

If you can convey information with a bit of action instead of dialogue, opting for action is usually better. After dinner and the kiss, the audience is wondering “will they…or won’t they?” The door closing on Frank answers that question far better than any bit of dialogue could.

Exposition Example #3: Demidov’s involvement

Key Expository Information: Demidov desperately wants to track down Alexander

Exposition example: Villain's backstory in The Tourist

The villian’s backstory ain’t too pretty

Exposition in the screenplay: this was done through two different scenes. Part of Alexander’s relationship with Demidov was explained in Ackerman’s Power Point presentation as described in Exposition Example #1. The rest was revealed through a conversation between Demidov and a double-crossing Swiss agent, Quinn.


A Gulfstream G550 executive jet banks over the Venetian
coast and comes in for a landing…

Wheels down. Stairway unfolds. The man who steps off
the plane is dressed in a hand-tailored Italian suit and
shoes that cost more than some cars. He’s flanked by two

IVAN DEMIDOV. In the flesh.


CAMERA floats over the rooftops toward the penthouse of a
ultra-high end business hotel.


Demidov sips a glass of red wine. The view from his room
rivals the one at the Danieli but Demidov pays no
attention. He’s busy scanning his emails on his

Knock, knock. A thick-necked BODYGUARD in the background
goes to answer the door. A moment later…

He ushers in Quinn, the Swiss Interpol agent.

Take a seat, Mr. Quinn. Can I
offer you a glass of Brunello?
It’s a ’97…

No thank you, Mr. Demidov.

Demidov swirls his glass.

You know I’d never admit this at
home, but Vodka is for peasants.
There’s much we could learn from
the Italians.

He smiles pleasantly at Quinn, then, on a dime, he turns
back to business.

Tell me I’m not going to be

Quinn takes out an envelope and passes it over.

I don’t think so.

He flips it open and examines the contents. WE GLIMPSE a
photo of CARA and some text.

(to himself)
He always had good taste…

Demidov makes a gesture and a second BODYGUARD with a
SCAR on his face gives Quinn an envelope filled with

Quinn tucks it away discreetly, as if embarrassed by the
directness of the pay off.

Mr. Demidov… if I may ask you a
question… Why do you care so much
about Alexander Pearce? I mean,
you’ve come here yourself… as if
it were personal.

Demidov looks at Quinn thoughtfully.

It may be difficult for you to
understand, Mr. Quinn; you Swiss
are mercenary by nature. But for
some of us, there are things more
important than money. I put my
trust in Alexander Pearce. He
betrayed that trust.

Quinn smiles tightly. He’s ready to get out of there.

And it’s bad business to let
somebody make a fool of you. If
Pearce gets away with it, what
does that say about me?

Exposition in the movie: we don’t learn about Demidov’s involvelment (renamed Reginald Shaw in the movie) through Ackerman. In fact, the first time we see him, we don’t know anything about him at all…just that this rather scary man in an expensive suit received information about Alexander from a mole–and ordered his private plane to change directions and head for Venice.

In one gesture, we know that Shaw is rich, powerful, ruthless, and that locating Alexander is his primary objective. We don’t know exactly why he’s after Alexander which increases the intrigue, keeping the audience in suspense. The movie also delays Shaw’s speech about Alexander’s cutting betrayal until the very end.

Exposition Example #4: the Italian police detective…and more on Demidov

Key Expository Information: Demidov/Shaw is after Alexander to reclaim the millions Alexander has stolen from him

Exposition in Film: Frank in The Tourist

Hapless Frank, consummate American tourist

Exposition in the screenplay: In the screenplay, the Italian police detective is named Domenico, and he’s a happy-go-lucky sort, not to mention a thorough detective. But his role doesn’t really add anything to the story (except the occasional bit of humor). His two key contributions are one, keeping Frank out of danger, at least temporarily, and two, cluing the audience about Demidov and why he’s after Frank.


Frank sits alone with a blanket over his shoulders. Most
of the blood has been wiped from his wound and he has a
rough bandage on his head.

From down the hallway a cheery stubble-faced POLICE
OFFICER, DOMENICO (30’s, animated), walks into the room
where Frank is waiting.

Domenico laughs, talking on his cell phone as he enters.
(in Italian)
You can’t let them stay over, man.
You start cuddling and then she
wants to borrow your car. Stop
cuddling, Tomaso!

Frank stands.

Excuse me…

(suddenly noticing
Hey, what are you doing in here?

The officers told me to wait here.
I’ve been sitting here for over
two hours…

Dominico glances over his shoulder.

I think they forgot about you.

Frank sits back down heavily. Domenico sits on the edge
of a desk.

What happened to you, anyway?

Somebody tried to kill me.

Domenico picks up Frank’s statement and glances at it.

Mr. Taylor, wow, you had quite a
day. Eh? We got chasing, we got

Domenico looks at mild-mannered Frank sitting there in
his boxers. The story seems unlikely.

You think I’m crazy but it’s all

Maybe you crazy AND it’s true, my

Domenico looks at Frank a little harder. Decides this
guy is not making all this up.

Okay, so who are these guys? Why
they mad at you?

I have absolutely no idea.

They followed you from the

They came to the room. They
pretended to be room service.

You don’t scopata one of their
girlfriends or something?

I didn’t “scopata” anybody!

Who is…

He consults a piece of paper.

Cara Mason?

Frank is quiet. Domenico playfully points at him.

I catch you, right?

In America the cops catch the
crooks, not the victim.

Ha ha, we do that sometimes here,

Domenico considers for a moment.

Is no domestic, then?


How long you know Cara Mason?

I met her yesterday.

And you take her to the Danieli?
That must have been good meeting,

I didn’t take her. She took me.

The infectious grin again lights up Domenico’s face.

You lead an exciting life, Mr.

Not usually.

Domenico picks up the phone and dials a number. He talks
in brisk Italian, listens again and replaces the

Signora Mason was staying with
“her husband” last night. You
marry her, Mr. Taylor?


I think maybe Signora Mason might
know why these guys behave badly.
What do you think?


I think that’s possible.

You got a phone number, mobile?

She didn’t give me one.

Domenico looks him over.

You need some clothes. I’ll be
right back.

He leaves Frank alone again.

Frank stands and half-heartedly follows him to the

He spots something in the adjoining room; a computer that
has been left on. He wanders over and looks at the

An idea comes into Frank’s head… he looks around. Nobody
is watching him. He glances at the inscription on the

Then quickly sits down. He does a search for “WANTED
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALS” and types in the name:


An immediate hit in the data base. Alexander Pearce’s
page fills the screen. The caption reads:


In place of a photograph there is just a black outline of
a man’s head.

Frank is about to scan for more information when he hears
Domenico returning. He quickly steps back into the room
where he was left…

DOMENICO enters carrying a garish SWEAT SUIT. He hands
it to Frank.

Here. Put these on. Time to go.

Frank looks at the clothes.

Um… thanks. Where are we going?

I’m taking you to the hospital,
Mr. Taylor. A doctor should take
a look at you.

I’d really rather just go–

Don’t worry. I put you in Padua,
away from Venice. You’ll be safe.
(scribbles his
Any worry, you call me. I give
you my home number.

Exposition in the movie: the Italian police detective plays a similar role in the movie. He gets Frank out of danger–temporarily–and he provides key information about Demidov (now renamed Shaw). Shaw and his gangsters have come to Venice to find Alexander, and there’s a bounty on his head. (There’s also a bit of business about cigarettes which is a setup which pays off during the climax.) While the movie dispensed with a lot of unnecessary dialogue, there’s still some. Frank rehashes information that we all already know: he wants to report an attempted murder on himself, he got involved because he met a beautiful woman on a train who took him to a hotel…and bad people are trying to kill Frank because of her.

Okay, this is all well and good for the detective to hear–but we don’t need to. The scene itself in the movie doesn’t drag too much thanks to the actors who spice it up with a bit of humor about American tourists. But you can’t bank on Johnny Depp delivering your exposition, so your screenplay shouldn’t repeat information that’s already been conveyed to the audience. If your screenplay is too long but you can’t see a way to cut pages, look for repeat information.

Cut that information out and begin the scene by making it clear that your characters have just gone over that info, although we, the audience, thankfully didn’t have to witness that dialogue. Then go into the new development that really is the purpose of this scene.

In The Tourist, this would be accomplished by starting the scene with the detective saying something like this to Frank, “your story is preposterous. Still, it’s more interesting than my stack of unfinished paperwork, so I will check it out.” Boom! You’ve conveyed that Frank and the detective have spoken (which is a prerequisite for later developments in the story), but you haven’t bored the audience by repeating what they already know.

Exposition Example #5: how Elise got involved with Alexander (Spoiler Alert!)

Key Expository Information: Elise got to know Alexander because it was part of her job as a Financial Crimes officer

Exposition example: Elise's backstory in The Tourist

Elegant, efficient Elise, not so consummate undercover agent

Exposition in the screenplay: This is more than just exposition, it’s a neat plot twist. From the beginning, we’ve been led to believe that Elise was just a beautiful woman caught in Alexander’s web, but with this key bit of information, we learn that she intended to be there as part of a long-term undercover operation.

In the screenplay, the information is revealed through a picture. Ackerman shows Frank a photo from the CID Academy, Class of 2002. Surprise, surprise, Elise is one of those graduates.


Ackerman leads Frank through the maze of desks and
police. Various members of the task force follow their
progress… Jean Luc, Jones, etc.

They arrive at a central INTEL area where Goyal sits in
front of several computer monitors.

He looks up as Ackerman and Frank arrive.

(to Goyal)
Pull up the CID Academy graduating
class for 2002.

Goyal raises an eyebrow, but does as he’s told. A few
moments later a photo of POLICE RECRUITS in uniform comes
up on screen.

Take a good look.

Frank peers at the screen. He spots the instructor–
Ackerman seven years younger.


Take a look at the second row.

INSERT CLOSE UP on the screen.

Frank examines the second row. One of the young women
is… CARA MASON. Her hair is pulled back. She looks more
the determined police cadet than the sexy siren… but
it’s definitely her.


He is dumbfounded.

We’ve been watching you this
entire time.

You saw those men try to kill me
and you didn’t intervene?

I’m trying to apprehend a major
criminal. I’m not a babysitter.

Frank grows angry.

I want to speak with somebody at
the American Embassy. I’m going
to tell them that you and your
undercover officer knowingly and
recklessly endangered the life of
an American citizen! Let’s see
what my government has to say
about that!

Jones clears her throat from a chair across the room.

We’re aware of the situation, Mr.
Taylor. But we take a long view
of these things… fortunately you
are unhurt…

Frank is incredulous.

Then I’ll go to the press. I’ll
tell the entire story to the New
York Times.

No. I don’t think you’ll do that.

Why not?

Because I don’t think you want to
see Cara’s entire career

Frank falls silent. Ackerman puts an arm around his
shoulder and leads him away from the others.



Frank stands on a balcony overlooking a waterway.
Ackerman emerges with two cups of espresso. Hands one to

Women like Cara don’t come along
very often.

In my case, they don’t come along
at all.

She’s the worst combination:
stunning looks and a brilliant

If she’s so smart, how did she get
caught up with Pearce?

It started out as a
straightforward placement…


Cara (younger) poses as an art student, sketching a
SCULPTURE in the Anticollegio.

…we ran her deep cover to build a
case against Pearce. It took. He
hired her as an assistant.

She turns her face and smiles at an UNSEEN MAN.


The wind blows in Cara’s hair. She sits on the top deck.
A MAN’S HAND passes her a drink as he walks by. She
smiles at him (again we do not see his face).

Then she began missing drops.
Omitting important details.


Ackerman turns to Frank.

She was no longer with us. She
was with him.

Ackerman finishes his espresso.

She explains it now as the
confusion of her new life outside
the academy. That I misread her
capacity for this kind of work.

Then why are you still using her?

She’s all I have, Mr. Taylor.


You think she’ll turn him in this

I don’t know.

Goyal walks up behind Ackerman waiting patiently for a
moment to interrupt him.

I do know however, that you are
very smitten with her.

Frank looks back at him evenly.

It’s not just me, is it?

Ackerman acknowledges the point with the barest of nods.

Exposition in the movie: the movie handled this exposition much more economically. First, Elise storms into the Financial Crimes temp HQ in Venice and gives the officer guarding the entrance her ID number. When she enters Acheson’s office, he greets her by saying, “you’ve certainly blown your cover now,” to which she responds she’s ready to give Alexander up.

Acheson answers with perfect British understatement, “you’ve lived with him for an entire year…during that time you haven’t provided one usable photograph…and now you’re ready to give Alexander up? It’s because of that tourist isn’t it? I wish I could understand your taste in men…a schoolteacher…who would’ve thought your tastes were so provincial?”

And with those brief lines, we gain a range of knowledge. We know Elise was an undercover agent. We know she didn’t fulfill her job responsibilities because her loyalties became conflicted, and with that knowledge, we also know her emotional entanglement with Alexander started very early. We also learn that Alexander isn’t the only one–she cares for Frank as well…and despite his desperate obsession, she will never feel that way towards Acheson.

Pretty heady stuff…and all with a few lines of well-written dialogue.

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: